Seqlo Automations · AI Workflow Orchestration

For agencies

Overflow build capacity, invisible to your client

You sold the work, but you don't have the builder. That's where I come in.

You close the deal and set your price. I never speak to your client unless you want me on the call.
You brief me on scope and timeline. I come back within a day with a fixed fee and a delivery date, or I tell you it's not a fit.
I build it and document it under your brand. You get the architecture notes and a runbook, with every failure state written down.
You deliver it and keep the relationship. Optional ongoing support, still under your name.

A typical engagement runs three to six workflows over four to six weeks. The flat fee lands between $9,500 and $14,000. What you charge on top of that is your business.

Reference build

A three-stage Claude pipeline that returns a finished PDF with no human in it

I built the document generation pipeline behind LaunchQuack. It automates a report that used to cost $500 to $2,000 and take up to six weeks to write. Now it runs in minutes.

What it does

An intake form fires a webhook. Three Claude calls run in sequence, and each one carries its own system prompt of several thousand words. The three outputs assemble into a styled HTML document. That renders to a branded PDF and goes out by email, with nobody touching it along the way.

The parts that were hard

Voice consistency across stateless calls. Three separate API calls with no shared memory have to read as a single consistent voice. The voice specification is replicated verbatim and versioned across all three prompts.
Making the model count before it concludes. A structured self-verification pass writes a zone-by-zone inventory into a non-rendering comment before any visible output. The verdict follows the counts instead of the impression.
Getting generated HTML through a strict-validation render API. Escaping and character encoding broke it first. Then schema shape and enum casing. Four failure modes, and every one of them stayed silent in a different way.

Make.com · Claude API · Typeform · Doppio · Gmail · custom HTML/CSS document template

Read the full case study (PDF)

3chained model calls, one continuous voice

15+page branded PDF, generated and delivered

0humans between submission and inbox

Most AI projects die between the demo and production. They fail below the model, in encoding and schema validation and exception handling. That's where the engineering time goes, and it's the part I treat as the job.

What I build

If someone on your team does it the same way every week, it can usually run without them

Most of these projects start the same way. Someone on your team handles a repetitive task by hand, and it takes real judgment to do it right. They're good at it, so nobody has questioned what it costs.

I take the process apart and separate the parts that actually need a person. Everything else gets built to run on its own. What comes out the other end is whatever you need. Sometimes that's a completed file. Sometimes it's an alert routed to three people. Often it's both.

Reading and checking paperwork

This covers claims files, loan applications, disclosures and compliance submissions. The documents come in and the system pulls out what matters. It checks that against your rules and hands back a summary with anything unusual marked for review.

Intake and routing

A form or an inbox becomes a structured record and lands with the right person, with a first response already drafted. Nothing gets re-keyed and nothing sits unclaimed for three days.

Reporting that builds itself

Your numbers already live across four or five systems. Nobody has to rebuild the same report every month. It assembles on a schedule in your format and goes out without being asked.

Scoring and recommendation

Applications, submissions and leads get measured against your criteria and ranked. The written reasoning comes attached, so a person can defend the call to a client or an auditor.

Quality checks before something ships

Anything leaving your organization gets read against your own standards first. One caught error usually covers what the build cost you.

If what you have in mind isn't on that list, it's still worth a conversation. Most of what I build is the same set of parts arranged differently.

What I need from you is one process, the rules your people apply to it, and access to whatever systems it touches. You supply the domain knowledge and I build the system. Prior industry experience is not required.

How engagements work

Three ways in

Workflow Teardown$1,500 – $2,500

Paid discovery. I map the process end to end and write the build spec. I validate every integration against the real endpoints, then ship one working workflow. The fee credits in full against the build if you go ahead. This step is why my builds don't stall.

Core System Build$9,500 – $14,000

Three to six connected workflows delivered as one system, in four to six weeks. Error handling and failure-state routing get specified up front. You get written handover documentation and thirty days of post-launch support. Fifty percent to start, fifty percent on acceptance. If the system doesn't do what the scope says it does, the final milestone isn't owed and you keep the documentation.

Care Plan$1,200 – $2,500 / mo

Monitoring and fixes, with platform and API changes absorbed. One new workflow per quarter. Optional, and never a condition of the build.

Flat fees against fixed scope, not hourly. You evaluate what gets delivered.

Why one person

One project at a time

I take on one project at a time, which is why the timeline is firm. You're talking directly to the engineer rather than an account manager relaying to a contractor.

If you need parallel capacity I'll say so upfront instead of stacking you behind four other clients. If a scope is outside what I can do well, you'll hear that on the first call rather than three weeks in.

Based in Florida. Seqlo Automations LLC.